<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 177 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50055</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on capital goods removed to a sister unit without intimation to the proper officer and without following the prescribed procedure was held inadmissible; the balance credit was required to be reversed because the statutory safeguards for such movement had not been observed. Contravention of the rules justified penalty, but the immediate reversal of a substantial part of the credit after detection was treated as a mitigating factor, so the penalties were reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 22:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 177 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50055</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on capital goods removed to a sister unit without intimation to the proper officer and without following the prescribed procedure was held inadmissible; the balance credit was required to be reversed because the statutory safeguards for such movement had not been observed. Contravention of the rules justified penalty, but the immediate reversal of a substantial part of the credit after detection was treated as a mitigating factor, so the penalties were reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>