<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 416 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786221</link>
    <description>Where a transferred capital asset is land, the valuaton finally determined for stamp purposes by an authority or court must be treated as the adoptable assessable value for the deeming fiction under section 50C, and that value (Rs.1,60,31,000) was held to replace a higher provisional figure for computing long term capital gains. Separately, the tribunal held that the deemed sale value under section 50C cannot be treated as the assessee&#039;s net consideration for claiming the capital gains exemption on reinvestment in a residential house; applying the impossibility principle, the full exemption under the residential investment provision was allowed since actual net consideration was invested. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 09:18:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 416 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786221</link>
      <description>Where a transferred capital asset is land, the valuaton finally determined for stamp purposes by an authority or court must be treated as the adoptable assessable value for the deeming fiction under section 50C, and that value (Rs.1,60,31,000) was held to replace a higher provisional figure for computing long term capital gains. Separately, the tribunal held that the deemed sale value under section 50C cannot be treated as the assessee&#039;s net consideration for claiming the capital gains exemption on reinvestment in a residential house; applying the impossibility principle, the full exemption under the residential investment provision was allowed since actual net consideration was invested. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>