<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 397 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786202</link>
    <description>Laying of telecom cables under or alongside roads falls outside taxable service under the service-tax definition, following Circular No.123/5/2010-TRU which excludes such activity. The contractors&#039; activities were held to be works contract services characterized as composite contracts involving supply of materials and labour; therefore the Supreme Court precedent on composite works contracts applies and supports non-taxability. The impugned demand was set aside and the appeal allowed, with consequential relief as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 09:17:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 397 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786202</link>
      <description>Laying of telecom cables under or alongside roads falls outside taxable service under the service-tax definition, following Circular No.123/5/2010-TRU which excludes such activity. The contractors&#039; activities were held to be works contract services characterized as composite contracts involving supply of materials and labour; therefore the Supreme Court precedent on composite works contracts applies and supports non-taxability. The impugned demand was set aside and the appeal allowed, with consequential relief as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>