<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Stamp duty valuation versus sale consideration safe harbour retrospective application; revision u/s 263 quashed as change of opinion</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96712</link>
    <description>Revision under section 263 was denied because the assessing officer adopted a legally permissible view in treating a 5.24% difference between stamp duty value and sale consideration as non-taxable; such a view is not &quot;erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue&quot; and therefore cannot be reopened as a change of opinion. The article holds that statutory tolerance bands introduced by later Finance Acts (5% then 10%) should be given retrospective, beneficial construction to mitigate hardship, and hence the impugned exercise of revisional power was quashed and relief granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 09:18:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 09:18:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Stamp duty valuation versus sale consideration safe harbour retrospective application; revision u/s 263 quashed as change of opinion</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96712</link>
      <description>Revision under section 263 was denied because the assessing officer adopted a legally permissible view in treating a 5.24% difference between stamp duty value and sale consideration as non-taxable; such a view is not &quot;erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue&quot; and therefore cannot be reopened as a change of opinion. The article holds that statutory tolerance bands introduced by later Finance Acts (5% then 10%) should be given retrospective, beneficial construction to mitigate hardship, and hence the impugned exercise of revisional power was quashed and relief granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 09:18:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>