<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1587 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466434</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that a belated income tax return cannot be treated as invalid where statutory interest applies for late filing, because treating it as invalid would nullify the interest provision; consequently framing assessment without issuing the jurisdictional notice was erroneous and the assessment under summary procedure was set aside. Separately, the tribunal found no basis for partially accepting a taxpayer&#039;s cash book for the demonetization period while rejecting other entries without reasons; having accepted earlier entries, the appellate authority could not sustain additions for unexplained bank deposits and those enhancements were disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 17:12:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1587 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466434</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that a belated income tax return cannot be treated as invalid where statutory interest applies for late filing, because treating it as invalid would nullify the interest provision; consequently framing assessment without issuing the jurisdictional notice was erroneous and the assessment under summary procedure was set aside. Separately, the tribunal found no basis for partially accepting a taxpayer&#039;s cash book for the demonetization period while rejecting other entries without reasons; having accepted earlier entries, the appellate authority could not sustain additions for unexplained bank deposits and those enhancements were disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>