https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50019 The Tribunal set aside the demand for the period from 1-1-1988 to 21-8-1988 due to the absence of a show cause notice. Deductions for secondary packing, turnover tax, average freight, insurance, octroi, handling charges, and cost of bought-out items were allowed. The issue of the relationship between the appellants and M/s. Nemaru Coiffure for the period from 1-4-1991 onwards was remanded for re-evaluation. The appeals were disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 06 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:19:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50019 The Tribunal set aside the demand for the period from 1-1-1988 to 21-8-1988 due to the absence of a show cause notice. Deductions for secondary packing, turnover tax, average freight, insurance, octroi, handling charges, and cost of bought-out items were allowed. The issue of the relationship between the appellants and M/s. Nemaru Coiffure for the period from 1-4-1991 onwards was remanded for re-evaluation. The appeals were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50019