<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 101 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49998</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of 25 gold bars with foreign markings and imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 on the present appellant for their involvement in dealing with smuggled gold. The appellants&#039; arguments against the nexus between Indian currency and the smuggled gold were considered, leading to the return of the confiscated Indian currency. The decision was based on the lack of contraband in the appellants&#039; premises and discrepancies in the seized amount compared to the value of the confiscated gold, granting the appellants the benefit of doubt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:35:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 101 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49998</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of 25 gold bars with foreign markings and imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 on the present appellant for their involvement in dealing with smuggled gold. The appellants&#039; arguments against the nexus between Indian currency and the smuggled gold were considered, leading to the return of the confiscated Indian currency. The decision was based on the lack of contraband in the appellants&#039; premises and discrepancies in the seized amount compared to the value of the confiscated gold, granting the appellants the benefit of doubt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>