https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466412 The challenge to the second ECIR, the arrest and the custodial remand was treated as identical to relief already considered in an earlier petition. The Court noted that the same issue had been decided by a co-ordinate Bench and that the Special Judge's remand order under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was a reasoned order. On that basis, the Court declined interference and held that no different view could be taken, leaving the arrest and remand undisturbed. en-us Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Feb 2026 13:23:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466412 The challenge to the second ECIR, the arrest and the custodial remand was treated as identical to relief already considered in an earlier petition. The Court noted that the same issue had been decided by a co-ordinate Bench and that the Special Judge's remand order under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was a reasoned order. On that basis, the Court declined interference and held that no different view could be taken, leaving the arrest and remand undisturbed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466412