https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466412 The court addressed whether a second ECIR based on material from a previously quashed ECIR can support arrest under the PMLA and whether custodial remand/order for production was valid. The court observed that the ED's own case treated the second ECIR as arising from the same transaction, which would render arrest constitutionally impermissible. However, because an identical issue was already considered and decided by a coordinate bench in a prior petition, the present petition was dismissed as devoid of a different view, notwithstanding the court's observations on illegality of arrest and remand. en-us Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Feb 2026 13:23:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466412 The court addressed whether a second ECIR based on material from a previously quashed ECIR can support arrest under the PMLA and whether custodial remand/order for production was valid. The court observed that the ED's own case treated the second ECIR as arising from the same transaction, which would render arrest constitutionally impermissible. However, because an identical issue was already considered and decided by a coordinate bench in a prior petition, the present petition was dismissed as devoid of a different view, notwithstanding the court's observations on illegality of arrest and remand. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 23 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466412