https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466415 Writ jurisdiction cannot be used to compel the Union and the DGFT to impose pre-import and actual user conditions by public notice contrary to the notified foreign trade framework. The Court treated the Handbook of Procedure requirements, including data and information for review of Standard Input Output Norms, as binding elements of the scheme rather than dispensable formalities, and rejected the request to declare the relevant procedure non-mandatory. The petition also failed as a PIL because the record did not show genuine public interest or sufficient bona fides. Judicial intervention in the policy and procedural choices governing foreign trade was therefore declined. en-us Wed, 23 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Feb 2026 14:20:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466415 Writ jurisdiction cannot be used to compel the Union and the DGFT to impose pre-import and actual user conditions by public notice contrary to the notified foreign trade framework. The Court treated the Handbook of Procedure requirements, including data and information for review of Standard Input Output Norms, as binding elements of the scheme rather than dispensable formalities, and rejected the request to declare the relevant procedure non-mandatory. The petition also failed as a PIL because the record did not show genuine public interest or sufficient bona fides. Judicial intervention in the policy and procedural choices governing foreign trade was therefore declined. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 23 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466415