<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1371 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466417</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay was considered under the sufficientcause standard; no grounds were stated and the tribunal found no reason to excuse a 1,288day delay, therefore refusal to condone delay was ordered and the appeal was dismissed as time barred. Because limitation was decisive, the tribunal did not examine the merits of the underlying dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 19:24:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1371 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466417</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay was considered under the sufficientcause standard; no grounds were stated and the tribunal found no reason to excuse a 1,288day delay, therefore refusal to condone delay was ordered and the appeal was dismissed as time barred. Because limitation was decisive, the tribunal did not examine the merits of the underlying dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>