<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1766 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466422</link>
    <description>Faceless assessment under the statute requires initiation and completion through the prescribed faceless procedure; notices issued by the jurisdictional assessing officer under the reassessment provision without conducting faceless assessment are contrary to the statutory scheme and therefore lack jurisdiction. The consequence is that such notices and all consequential proceedings are set aside as invalid for noncompliance with the faceless assessment requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 19:24:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1766 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466422</link>
      <description>Faceless assessment under the statute requires initiation and completion through the prescribed faceless procedure; notices issued by the jurisdictional assessing officer under the reassessment provision without conducting faceless assessment are contrary to the statutory scheme and therefore lack jurisdiction. The consequence is that such notices and all consequential proceedings are set aside as invalid for noncompliance with the faceless assessment requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>