<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Validity of assessment under Section 143(1)(a): mandatory intimation required before adjustments, intimation quashed for non-compliance.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96664</link>
    <description>The first proviso to Section 143(1)(a) is mandatory and requires that any proposed adjustment to a return of income be intimated to the assessee in writing or electronically and the assessee be given an opportunity to respond; failure to issue that intimation renders any adjustment under Section 143(1)(a) invalid. On the facts, no such intimation was issued and the intimation order was quashed. The Revenue&#039;s argument that issuing the intimation would be futile was rejected: compliance with the mandatory intimation requirement cannot be bypassed, and the assessee could potentially respond (including by seeking condonation) before any adjustment is made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:11:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:11:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Validity of assessment under Section 143(1)(a): mandatory intimation required before adjustments, intimation quashed for non-compliance.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96664</link>
      <description>The first proviso to Section 143(1)(a) is mandatory and requires that any proposed adjustment to a return of income be intimated to the assessee in writing or electronically and the assessee be given an opportunity to respond; failure to issue that intimation renders any adjustment under Section 143(1)(a) invalid. On the facts, no such intimation was issued and the intimation order was quashed. The Revenue&#039;s argument that issuing the intimation would be futile was rejected: compliance with the mandatory intimation requirement cannot be bypassed, and the assessee could potentially respond (including by seeking condonation) before any adjustment is made.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:11:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>