<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Characterisation of payments to medical consultants as professional fees, resulting in no employer default and appeal dismissed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96662</link>
    <description>Payments to medical consultants were held to be for independent professional services rather than salaried employment because consultancy agreements established a principaltoprincipal relationship. The consultants retained control over manner of service, and contractual supervision measures (fixed hours, reporting, leave rules, exclusivity clauses) did not convert a contract for service into a contract of service. Where consultants declared the income in their tax returns, the payer could not be treated as an assessee in default for TDS; the appeal by revenue was dismissed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:10:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:10:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Characterisation of payments to medical consultants as professional fees, resulting in no employer default and appeal dismissed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96662</link>
      <description>Payments to medical consultants were held to be for independent professional services rather than salaried employment because consultancy agreements established a principaltoprincipal relationship. The consultants retained control over manner of service, and contractual supervision measures (fixed hours, reporting, leave rules, exclusivity clauses) did not convert a contract for service into a contract of service. Where consultants declared the income in their tax returns, the payer could not be treated as an assessee in default for TDS; the appeal by revenue was dismissed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:10:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>