<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer pricing adjustments and R&amp;D weighted deduction decisions: TP adjustments deleted in several heads; DSIR approval limits deduction.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96657</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustments on corporate guarantee commission and interest on convertible loans were rejected because identical issues were previously decided in favour of the taxpayer by the ITAT; outcome: adjustments deleted. Reimbursement of expenses was held at arm&#039;s length on documentary proof and past ITAT precedent; outcome: adjustment denied. Sale of goods to an AE benchmarked using Compustat North America fell within the 3% safe harbour margin and the adjustment was dismissed. Three rejected comparables were accepted as functionally and jurisdictionally comparable; outcome: AO/TPO rejection overturned. DIANE database search for a later year failed Rule 10CA requirements; outcome: comparable search rejected. Claim for weighted R&amp;D deduction limited to expenditure approved by the competent authority was upheld; outcome: deduction restricted to DSIR-approved quantum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:08:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:08:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer pricing adjustments and R&amp;D weighted deduction decisions: TP adjustments deleted in several heads; DSIR approval limits deduction.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96657</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustments on corporate guarantee commission and interest on convertible loans were rejected because identical issues were previously decided in favour of the taxpayer by the ITAT; outcome: adjustments deleted. Reimbursement of expenses was held at arm&#039;s length on documentary proof and past ITAT precedent; outcome: adjustment denied. Sale of goods to an AE benchmarked using Compustat North America fell within the 3% safe harbour margin and the adjustment was dismissed. Three rejected comparables were accepted as functionally and jurisdictionally comparable; outcome: AO/TPO rejection overturned. DIANE database search for a later year failed Rule 10CA requirements; outcome: comparable search rejected. Claim for weighted R&amp;D deduction limited to expenditure approved by the competent authority was upheld; outcome: deduction restricted to DSIR-approved quantum.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:08:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>