<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Clearing and Forwarding services: service tax on C&amp;F upheld, ancillary demands quashed; remand for limitation and reduced penalty ordered.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96644</link>
    <description>High Court finds the five-year limitation for service tax recovery applies and subsections 1A and 3 of Section 73 are inapplicable because past dues were paid before issuance of the show cause notice and arose prior to May 2004; outcome: revenue has five years from the appellant&#039;s January 29, 2004 payment to raise a claim. The Court upholds taxation of clearing and forwarding services but quashes demands treating bending, bundling and stock verification as part of those services; outcome: those demands are set aside with liberty to tax correctly. The Tribunal&#039;s remand on limitation and penalty is set aside and the matter is remitted to the first authority to record evidence and decide, with a reduced penalty and 10% simple interest directed on the consolidated C&amp;F tax demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:02:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:02:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Clearing and Forwarding services: service tax on C&amp;F upheld, ancillary demands quashed; remand for limitation and reduced penalty ordered.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96644</link>
      <description>High Court finds the five-year limitation for service tax recovery applies and subsections 1A and 3 of Section 73 are inapplicable because past dues were paid before issuance of the show cause notice and arose prior to May 2004; outcome: revenue has five years from the appellant&#039;s January 29, 2004 payment to raise a claim. The Court upholds taxation of clearing and forwarding services but quashes demands treating bending, bundling and stock verification as part of those services; outcome: those demands are set aside with liberty to tax correctly. The Tribunal&#039;s remand on limitation and penalty is set aside and the matter is remitted to the first authority to record evidence and decide, with a reduced penalty and 10% simple interest directed on the consolidated C&amp;F tax demand.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:02:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>