<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 225 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786030</link>
    <description>In a public utility project delayed at the commissioning stage, reasonable compensation by way of liquidated damages may be awarded under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 without strict proof of exact actual loss, especially where the stipulation addresses delay affecting public interest and environmental objectives. The defaulting party must show that no loss was caused or that the clause is penal. Under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an appellate court cannot rework or reduce a plausible compensation determination already made within the contractual framework under Section 34 unless it is shown to be arbitrary, perverse, or outside that framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:16:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 225 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786030</link>
      <description>In a public utility project delayed at the commissioning stage, reasonable compensation by way of liquidated damages may be awarded under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 without strict proof of exact actual loss, especially where the stipulation addresses delay affecting public interest and environmental objectives. The defaulting party must show that no loss was caused or that the clause is penal. Under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an appellate court cannot rework or reduce a plausible compensation determination already made within the contractual framework under Section 34 unless it is shown to be arbitrary, perverse, or outside that framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>