<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 241 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786046</link>
    <description>Invocation of a corporate guarantee on 12.02.2020 triggered a fresh cause of action and the threeyear limitation period began from that date; acknowledgements recorded in subsequent balance sheets constituted acknowledgement within the meaning of the Limitation Act, extending limitation and rendering the 14.04.2025 filing timely. The Form1 annexed by the financial creditor contained requisite particulars of debt and default, and the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s consideration of amounts realised in liquidation and CIRP to determine outstanding debt was treated as public record. The appellate forum found no error in admitting the insolvency petition and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:16:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 241 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786046</link>
      <description>Invocation of a corporate guarantee on 12.02.2020 triggered a fresh cause of action and the threeyear limitation period began from that date; acknowledgements recorded in subsequent balance sheets constituted acknowledgement within the meaning of the Limitation Act, extending limitation and rendering the 14.04.2025 filing timely. The Form1 annexed by the financial creditor contained requisite particulars of debt and default, and the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s consideration of amounts realised in liquidation and CIRP to determine outstanding debt was treated as public record. The appellate forum found no error in admitting the insolvency petition and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>