<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 250 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786055</link>
    <description>An assessment framed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre before the faceless assessment notification became effective was without jurisdiction under sections 147, 144B and 151A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, because the faceless assessment mechanism had not yet commenced on the date of the order. The jurisdictional defect rendered the assessment unsustainable, and the impugned order was quashed. The appeal thus succeeded on the threshold issue of competence to make the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 16:32:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 250 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786055</link>
      <description>An assessment framed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre before the faceless assessment notification became effective was without jurisdiction under sections 147, 144B and 151A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, because the faceless assessment mechanism had not yet commenced on the date of the order. The jurisdictional defect rendered the assessment unsustainable, and the impugned order was quashed. The appeal thus succeeded on the threshold issue of competence to make the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>