<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 280 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786085</link>
    <description>HC affirmed that the statutory 10% pre-deposit under GST law must be paid before preferring an appeal; the court ordered the appellant to pay 10% and refile the appeal (electronically or physically) and directed the appeal to be kept pending until the Supreme Court decides similar matters on GST levy and classification of Fish Meal. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, preserving the pending appellate remedy conditional on compliance with the predeposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:16:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 280 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786085</link>
      <description>HC affirmed that the statutory 10% pre-deposit under GST law must be paid before preferring an appeal; the court ordered the appellant to pay 10% and refile the appeal (electronically or physically) and directed the appeal to be kept pending until the Supreme Court decides similar matters on GST levy and classification of Fish Meal. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, preserving the pending appellate remedy conditional on compliance with the predeposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>