<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reopening of income-tax assessment based on missing certificate invalidated; reassessment quashed for lack of recorded reasons</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96631</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment under the income tax code was challenged on the ground that the reasons recorded relied solely on the claim of interest deduction made without a certificate. The court held that validity of reassessment must be tested only by the reasons recorded; material asserted only in an affidavit cannot supply a basis. The absence of a certificate was not a valid ground where statutes did not require filing it in the assessed facts, and precedent distinguishing cases where expenditure related to taxfree income was disallowable was applied. Consequence: reassessment jurisdiction was invalidated and the appeal by the assessee allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:16:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:16:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reopening of income-tax assessment based on missing certificate invalidated; reassessment quashed for lack of recorded reasons</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96631</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment under the income tax code was challenged on the ground that the reasons recorded relied solely on the claim of interest deduction made without a certificate. The court held that validity of reassessment must be tested only by the reasons recorded; material asserted only in an affidavit cannot supply a basis. The absence of a certificate was not a valid ground where statutes did not require filing it in the assessed facts, and precedent distinguishing cases where expenditure related to taxfree income was disallowable was applied. Consequence: reassessment jurisdiction was invalidated and the appeal by the assessee allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 09:16:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>