<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 154 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49950</link>
    <description>Printed wrappers whose printing is not merely incidental to packing but conveys the nature, brand, and contents of the goods are classifiable as products of the printing industry under sub-heading 4901.90, rather than as packing material under sub-heading 4823.90. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in the assessee&#039;s own case and treated the printed matter as giving the wrapper its essential character within the relevant Section and Chapter Notes. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on other authorities and an asserted departmental review did not justify departure from that binding position, so the assessee&#039;s classification was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:53:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 154 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49950</link>
      <description>Printed wrappers whose printing is not merely incidental to packing but conveys the nature, brand, and contents of the goods are classifiable as products of the printing industry under sub-heading 4901.90, rather than as packing material under sub-heading 4823.90. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in the assessee&#039;s own case and treated the printed matter as giving the wrapper its essential character within the relevant Section and Chapter Notes. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on other authorities and an asserted departmental review did not justify departure from that binding position, so the assessee&#039;s classification was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>