https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49942 The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the revocation of the Customs Licence and forfeiture of the security deposit. It found no evidence that the appellant had sublet Customs clearance work to an unauthorized company, "TRACK." The Bills of Entry and relevant documents were signed by the appellant or their authorized representative, and the individual who signed Annexure 2 had a valid 'G' Card without indications of working for another entity. Therefore, the revocation and forfeiture were deemed unsustainable, leading to the appeal's success. en-us Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:20:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49942 The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the revocation of the Customs Licence and forfeiture of the security deposit. It found no evidence that the appellant had sublet Customs clearance work to an unauthorized company, "TRACK." The Bills of Entry and relevant documents were signed by the appellant or their authorized representative, and the individual who signed Annexure 2 had a valid 'G' Card without indications of working for another entity. Therefore, the revocation and forfeiture were deemed unsustainable, leading to the appeal's success. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49942