<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>If not now, then when?. Part three under GST Laws.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15810</link>
    <description>Three high court rulings under GST emphasize mandatory consideration of GSTR 3B and GSTR 9 records before adverse adjudication, strict observance of natural justice and effective communication of show cause notices to taxpayers, and permissive condonation of delay where lack of timely representation prevented filing; each case resulted in quashing or setting aside of prior orders and remand for fresh decision with opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:25:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:25:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>If not now, then when?. Part three under GST Laws.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15810</link>
      <description>Three high court rulings under GST emphasize mandatory consideration of GSTR 3B and GSTR 9 records before adverse adjudication, strict observance of natural justice and effective communication of show cause notices to taxpayers, and permissive condonation of delay where lack of timely representation prevented filing; each case resulted in quashing or setting aside of prior orders and remand for fresh decision with opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:25:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>