https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15808 The article criticises recurring GST adjudication orders that are later quashed, attributing failures to inadequate legal updating, institutional pressure to confirm demands, and inconsistent outcomes across the three-tier departmental adjudicatory structure. It summarizes three judicial decisions illustrating quashed orders, deposit or refund directions, and restoration of registration where no liability existed, and argues these trends waste taxpayer resources and reflect the need for improved legal training, adherence to precedents and internal quality controls. en-us Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:25:12 +0530 Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:25:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15808 The article criticises recurring GST adjudication orders that are later quashed, attributing failures to inadequate legal updating, institutional pressure to confirm demands, and inconsistent outcomes across the three-tier departmental adjudicatory structure. It summarizes three judicial decisions illustrating quashed orders, deposit or refund directions, and restoration of registration where no liability existed, and argues these trends waste taxpayer resources and reflect the need for improved legal training, adherence to precedents and internal quality controls. Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:25:12 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15808