https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785979 Serious allegations that the admission deed containing the arbitration clause was forged and fabricated meant the existence of the arbitration agreement itself was in doubt, so the dispute was not referable to arbitration at the Sections 8 and 11 stage until valid consent was shown at least prima facie. Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 could not be used to reappreciate evidence or displace concurrent factual findings that the deed's genuineness was seriously disputed and the original or certified copy was not produced. The referral order was unsustainable, while refusal to appoint an arbitrator was upheld. en-us Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:24:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785979 Serious allegations that the admission deed containing the arbitration clause was forged and fabricated meant the existence of the arbitration agreement itself was in doubt, so the dispute was not referable to arbitration at the Sections 8 and 11 stage until valid consent was shown at least prima facie. Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 could not be used to reappreciate evidence or displace concurrent factual findings that the deed's genuineness was seriously disputed and the original or certified copy was not produced. The referral order was unsustainable, while refusal to appoint an arbitrator was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785979