<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 187 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785992</link>
    <description>Alleged contravention of foreign exchange rules for routing import payments outside authorised dealers without prior RBI approval was treated as breach; tribunal applied appellate discretion and proportionality to reduce penalty, noting long delay, partial pre-deposit payment, and practical recovery inability, and directed reduction of penalty to 50% for one appellant while maintaining the penalty for others. The tribunal relied on comparative reasoning with a similar transaction chain involving redirected import payments and held that proportional reduction to the amount already paid was appropriate as a mitigating consequence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:24:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 187 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785992</link>
      <description>Alleged contravention of foreign exchange rules for routing import payments outside authorised dealers without prior RBI approval was treated as breach; tribunal applied appellate discretion and proportionality to reduce penalty, noting long delay, partial pre-deposit payment, and practical recovery inability, and directed reduction of penalty to 50% for one appellant while maintaining the penalty for others. The tribunal relied on comparative reasoning with a similar transaction chain involving redirected import payments and held that proportional reduction to the amount already paid was appropriate as a mitigating consequence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>