<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 202 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786007</link>
    <description>Disallowance of interest paid on TDS for VAT and royalty was treated as a statutory expenditure and therefore not allowable; that ground was dismissed. Cash payments made to a government power utility were treated as valid electricity expenses under the rule governing payments to government bodies because the taxpayer had no business accounts that year and paid in cash; that ground was allowed. Disallowance under the provision for payments to specified persons in respect of interest paid to finance companies was rejected because the interest was paid by a partner in his personal capacity and later reimbursed on behalf of the firm, making the reimbursement allowable; that ground was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:24:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 202 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786007</link>
      <description>Disallowance of interest paid on TDS for VAT and royalty was treated as a statutory expenditure and therefore not allowable; that ground was dismissed. Cash payments made to a government power utility were treated as valid electricity expenses under the rule governing payments to government bodies because the taxpayer had no business accounts that year and paid in cash; that ground was allowed. Disallowance under the provision for payments to specified persons in respect of interest paid to finance companies was rejected because the interest was paid by a partner in his personal capacity and later reimbursed on behalf of the firm, making the reimbursement allowable; that ground was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=786007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>