<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 170 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49925</link>
    <description>Anti-dumping duty is sustainable only where dumping is established by a comparison showing export price below normal value and where injury and causal link to dumped imports are supported by the relevant injury indicators. On that basis, duty was not justified for the exporter whose dumping margin was negative, while the challenge failed for the other exporters because the authority&#039;s findings on imports, market share, profitability, stocks, and injury to the domestic industry were upheld. The material also states that an unsupported 2% handling charge should not be added to landed value for injury-margin computation, and that anti-dumping duty may be expressed in US dollar terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:27:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 170 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49925</link>
      <description>Anti-dumping duty is sustainable only where dumping is established by a comparison showing export price below normal value and where injury and causal link to dumped imports are supported by the relevant injury indicators. On that basis, duty was not justified for the exporter whose dumping margin was negative, while the challenge failed for the other exporters because the authority&#039;s findings on imports, market share, profitability, stocks, and injury to the domestic industry were upheld. The material also states that an unsupported 2% handling charge should not be added to landed value for injury-margin computation, and that anti-dumping duty may be expressed in US dollar terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>