<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Import classification dispute over linear accelerator held time-barred under limitation; SCN set aside and appeal allowed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96593</link>
    <description>SCN issued after provisional assessment for imported medical equipment was held time-barred under limitation rules; the Tribunal treated extended period considerations under Section 28(4) as inapplicable and relied on coordinate precedents finding similar clearance-stage examinations beyond the normal period. The Tribunal noted a bona fide classification dispute over tariff heading, observed that burden of proof lay with the Revenue on mis-declaration or suppression, and therefore struck down the SCN. Consequence: confiscation, penalties and interest claims were not adjudicated on merits; the appeal was allowed and the impugned order set aside with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:24:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:24:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Import classification dispute over linear accelerator held time-barred under limitation; SCN set aside and appeal allowed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96593</link>
      <description>SCN issued after provisional assessment for imported medical equipment was held time-barred under limitation rules; the Tribunal treated extended period considerations under Section 28(4) as inapplicable and relied on coordinate precedents finding similar clearance-stage examinations beyond the normal period. The Tribunal noted a bona fide classification dispute over tariff heading, observed that burden of proof lay with the Revenue on mis-declaration or suppression, and therefore struck down the SCN. Consequence: confiscation, penalties and interest claims were not adjudicated on merits; the appeal was allowed and the impugned order set aside with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:24:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>