<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 111 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49924</link>
    <description>The appeals were filed against the Commissioner of Customs&#039; order regarding the valuation of exported goods. The Commissioner found no overvaluation, confirmed correct drawback payments, and dropped proceedings for recovery. Allegations of overvaluation based on DRI reports were dismissed due to differing quality standards. Discrepancies in consignee details were noted, but no conclusive evidence of under-invoicing accepted by Customs was found. The Tribunal held that Moscow&#039;s value declaration should not impact goods&#039; valuation, dismissing challenges to non-confiscation and penalty imposition, ultimately dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:23:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 111 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49924</link>
      <description>The appeals were filed against the Commissioner of Customs&#039; order regarding the valuation of exported goods. The Commissioner found no overvaluation, confirmed correct drawback payments, and dropped proceedings for recovery. Allegations of overvaluation based on DRI reports were dismissed due to differing quality standards. Discrepancies in consignee details were noted, but no conclusive evidence of under-invoicing accepted by Customs was found. The Tribunal held that Moscow&#039;s value declaration should not impact goods&#039; valuation, dismissing challenges to non-confiscation and penalty imposition, ultimately dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>