<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1404 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466369</link>
    <description>Reopening an incometax assessment in the name of a company struck off under the Companies Act 1956 is impermissible because dissolution under that Act effects removal from the register and cessation of corporate existence; consequence: notices issued to the nonexistent entity lack operative foundation and cannot sustain assessment proceedings. The Companies Act 2013 contains an express exception preserving a dissolved company&#039;s existence for realisation of dues, whereas the 1956 Act contains no comparable saving; consequence: poststrikeoff tax actions must respect that absence and cannot be justified by the 2013 Act&#039;s framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 12:41:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1404 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466369</link>
      <description>Reopening an incometax assessment in the name of a company struck off under the Companies Act 1956 is impermissible because dissolution under that Act effects removal from the register and cessation of corporate existence; consequence: notices issued to the nonexistent entity lack operative foundation and cannot sustain assessment proceedings. The Companies Act 2013 contains an express exception preserving a dissolved company&#039;s existence for realisation of dues, whereas the 1956 Act contains no comparable saving; consequence: poststrikeoff tax actions must respect that absence and cannot be justified by the 2013 Act&#039;s framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>