https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466377 A writ petition challenging cancellation of GST registration was not entertained because the State GST framework provided efficacious alternative remedies. The aggrieved person could seek revocation of cancellation under Section 30 read with Rule 23 of the State GST Rules, 2017, and could also pursue an appeal under Section 107 of the State GST Act, 2017. In view of these statutory remedies, the High Court declined to exercise its extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and left the petitioner to pursue the available remedies under the Act. en-us Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Feb 2026 22:11:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466377 A writ petition challenging cancellation of GST registration was not entertained because the State GST framework provided efficacious alternative remedies. The aggrieved person could seek revocation of cancellation under Section 30 read with Rule 23 of the State GST Rules, 2017, and could also pursue an appeal under Section 107 of the State GST Act, 2017. In view of these statutory remedies, the High Court declined to exercise its extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and left the petitioner to pursue the available remedies under the Act. Case-Laws GST Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466377