<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 138 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49915</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai held that the cost of drawings provided by customers for forged products should not be included in the assessable value. The Tribunal found that the assessee was not responsible for product design but solely produced forgings based on customer dimensions. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, rejecting the department&#039;s argument regarding potential development costs if drawings were not supplied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:00:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 138 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49915</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai held that the cost of drawings provided by customers for forged products should not be included in the assessable value. The Tribunal found that the assessee was not responsible for product design but solely produced forgings based on customer dimensions. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, rejecting the department&#039;s argument regarding potential development costs if drawings were not supplied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>