<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 106 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49908</link>
    <description>In job-work valuation of processed grey fabric, the declared selling price furnished by the trader was treated as the proper basis, and the excise authorities were not entitled to reopen that value by probing the trader&#039;s alleged profit or undervaluation; the additional duty demand on this ground was unsustainable. On limitation, the notice was issued well beyond six months, the Department already had the relevant facts, and the extended period was unavailable; the demand was therefore barred by limitation. The adjudication order was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:39:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 106 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49908</link>
      <description>In job-work valuation of processed grey fabric, the declared selling price furnished by the trader was treated as the proper basis, and the excise authorities were not entitled to reopen that value by probing the trader&#039;s alleged profit or undervaluation; the additional duty demand on this ground was unsustainable. On limitation, the notice was issued well beyond six months, the Department already had the relevant facts, and the extended period was unavailable; the demand was therefore barred by limitation. The adjudication order was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>