<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 125 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49901</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai dismissed applications for condoning a four-year delay in filing under section 129D(1) of the Act, citing no provision for condonation of delay under section 35E(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The applications and subsequent appeals were dismissed as barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:10:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 125 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49901</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai dismissed applications for condoning a four-year delay in filing under section 129D(1) of the Act, citing no provision for condonation of delay under section 35E(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The applications and subsequent appeals were dismissed as barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>