<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 137 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785942</link>
    <description>Eligibility for concessional basic customs duty on imported Ethernet switches depended on factual classification as Carrier Ethernet Switches or Enterprise/Non-Carrier Ethernet Switches. The Tribunal&#039;s finding, based on technical material, customer certifications, OEM clarification and the TEC report, was accepted as a proper fact-based determination, and the High Court found no perversity or legal infirmity; no substantial question of law arose. CBIC Circular No. 08/2023-Customs was held inapplicable to imports made between November 2020 and February 2022, and it did not alter the duty benefit. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 08:39:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 137 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785942</link>
      <description>Eligibility for concessional basic customs duty on imported Ethernet switches depended on factual classification as Carrier Ethernet Switches or Enterprise/Non-Carrier Ethernet Switches. The Tribunal&#039;s finding, based on technical material, customer certifications, OEM clarification and the TEC report, was accepted as a proper fact-based determination, and the High Court found no perversity or legal infirmity; no substantial question of law arose. CBIC Circular No. 08/2023-Customs was held inapplicable to imports made between November 2020 and February 2022, and it did not alter the duty benefit. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>