https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785934 Writ interference was refused where allegations disclosed cognizable offences and prima facie involvement in proceeds of crime, even though the facts also engaged special statutory regimes. The Court held that FIR registration was not barred, police action could follow information from the enforcement agency, and a distinct conspiracy could proceed independently despite parallel corporate or securities issues. It also held that cognizance need not be supported by a detailed speaking order and that writ review cannot assess the probative value of investigation material after charge-sheet. On the money-laundering aspect, prima facie material supported continuation of PMLA proceedings and provisional attachment. en-us Fri, 23 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Feb 2026 08:38:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785934 Writ interference was refused where allegations disclosed cognizable offences and prima facie involvement in proceeds of crime, even though the facts also engaged special statutory regimes. The Court held that FIR registration was not barred, police action could follow information from the enforcement agency, and a distinct conspiracy could proceed independently despite parallel corporate or securities issues. It also held that cognizance need not be supported by a detailed speaking order and that writ review cannot assess the probative value of investigation material after charge-sheet. On the money-laundering aspect, prima facie material supported continuation of PMLA proceedings and provisional attachment. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 23 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785934