https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785936 Under the PMLA framework, the court finds that co-accused statements alone, being contradictory and uncorroborated, do not prima facie establish that the applicant held proceeds of crime; absence of forged remittance forms, no applicantoperated outward remittance account, and documentary explanations for relatives' receipts weaken the presumption. Applying the triple test (flight, tamper, influence) the court found no material on risk of flight, witness tampering, or reoffending and noted a stalled trial undermining speedytrial rights under Article 21; accordingly the applicant was granted regular bail subject to conditions and surety. en-us Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Feb 2026 08:38:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785936 Under the PMLA framework, the court finds that co-accused statements alone, being contradictory and uncorroborated, do not prima facie establish that the applicant held proceeds of crime; absence of forged remittance forms, no applicantoperated outward remittance account, and documentary explanations for relatives' receipts weaken the presumption. Applying the triple test (flight, tamper, influence) the court found no material on risk of flight, witness tampering, or reoffending and noted a stalled trial undermining speedytrial rights under Article 21; accordingly the applicant was granted regular bail subject to conditions and surety. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785936