<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Roasting of Rava/Suji found not to be manufacture; no excise duty on roasting, appeal allowed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96549</link>
    <description>Whether roasting plain Rava/Suji constitutes &#039;&#039;manufacture&#039;&#039; was decided by applying the change-in-character, use or marketability test and HSN explanatory notes; the tribunal concluded that single or double roasting only reduces moisture and does not alter the product&#039;s character, use or marketability, so no new commodity arises. Consequently the process does not fall within the definition of manufacture under central excise law, and roasted Rava/Suji is not leviable to excise duty. The impugned order was set aside and the appeals allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 08:38:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 08:38:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Roasting of Rava/Suji found not to be manufacture; no excise duty on roasting, appeal allowed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96549</link>
      <description>Whether roasting plain Rava/Suji constitutes &#039;&#039;manufacture&#039;&#039; was decided by applying the change-in-character, use or marketability test and HSN explanatory notes; the tribunal concluded that single or double roasting only reduces moisture and does not alter the product&#039;s character, use or marketability, so no new commodity arises. Consequently the process does not fall within the definition of manufacture under central excise law, and roasted Rava/Suji is not leviable to excise duty. The impugned order was set aside and the appeals allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 08:38:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>