<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1743 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466333</link>
    <description>Bail under Section 439 CrPC in a PMLA prosecution was declined where the material showed prima facie involvement in laundering-related activity linked to a large-scale examination fraud. The record indicated alleged exchange of original answer booklets with forged sheets, printing of duplicate bar codes, preparation of forged mark-sheets and admit cards, direct links with co-accused and students, and substantial cash and digital transfers into the applicant&#039;s account that were not satisfactorily explained. In view of the seriousness of the alleged conduct and the investigation material, the court found no ground to exercise bail jurisdiction and rejected the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 20:17:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1743 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466333</link>
      <description>Bail under Section 439 CrPC in a PMLA prosecution was declined where the material showed prima facie involvement in laundering-related activity linked to a large-scale examination fraud. The record indicated alleged exchange of original answer booklets with forged sheets, printing of duplicate bar codes, preparation of forged mark-sheets and admit cards, direct links with co-accused and students, and substantial cash and digital transfers into the applicant&#039;s account that were not satisfactorily explained. In view of the seriousness of the alleged conduct and the investigation material, the court found no ground to exercise bail jurisdiction and rejected the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>