<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1402 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466352</link>
    <description>Best-judgment assessment treated all bank credits as turnover and AO adopted an 8% net profit rate, while appellate authority reduced it; on challenge, absent any bank-credit particulars from the taxpayer the tribunal upheld reliance on bank credits and directed income estimation at 5% of gross receipts, adopting a prevailing net profit benchmark. Separately, addition for unexplained investment premised on an agreement and third-party statement was set aside for re-examination because the taxpayer was not confronted and received only a single notice during the pandemic; consequence: remand to the assessing officer for fresh adjudication after opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 14:14:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1402 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466352</link>
      <description>Best-judgment assessment treated all bank credits as turnover and AO adopted an 8% net profit rate, while appellate authority reduced it; on challenge, absent any bank-credit particulars from the taxpayer the tribunal upheld reliance on bank credits and directed income estimation at 5% of gross receipts, adopting a prevailing net profit benchmark. Separately, addition for unexplained investment premised on an agreement and third-party statement was set aside for re-examination because the taxpayer was not confronted and received only a single notice during the pandemic; consequence: remand to the assessing officer for fresh adjudication after opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>