<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 133 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49885</link>
    <description>Valuation of processed fabrics cleared by a job worker is to be based on the processor&#039;s cost of raw materials, manufacturing cost and profit, as recognised in Ujagar Prints. A relationship between the job worker and the supplier of grey fabrics does not by itself justify adopting the principal manufacturer&#039;s resale price. An enhancement is warranted only where the declared manufacturing cost is shown to be false, artificially suppressed, or supported by a flow-back of consideration. On the stated facts, no such material existed, and similar processing for unrelated parties at the same cost supported the declared cost structure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:59:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 133 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49885</link>
      <description>Valuation of processed fabrics cleared by a job worker is to be based on the processor&#039;s cost of raw materials, manufacturing cost and profit, as recognised in Ujagar Prints. A relationship between the job worker and the supplier of grey fabrics does not by itself justify adopting the principal manufacturer&#039;s resale price. An enhancement is warranted only where the declared manufacturing cost is shown to be false, artificially suppressed, or supported by a flow-back of consideration. On the stated facts, no such material existed, and similar processing for unrelated parties at the same cost supported the declared cost structure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>