<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 73 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49880</link>
    <description>A 100% Export Oriented Unit does not lose EOU status merely because it makes an initial clearance into the Domestic Tariff Area; conversion depends on approval by the competent authority and fulfilment of prescribed conditions. The Ministry of Industry&#039;s communications showed that debonding had been approved only in principle and remained conditional, including payment of duty as determined by Customs. Customs authorities could not confer or withdraw EOU status, since that function rested with the Ministry. On those facts, the relevant conversion date was not the first DTA clearance, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 73 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49880</link>
      <description>A 100% Export Oriented Unit does not lose EOU status merely because it makes an initial clearance into the Domestic Tariff Area; conversion depends on approval by the competent authority and fulfilment of prescribed conditions. The Ministry of Industry&#039;s communications showed that debonding had been approved only in principle and remained conditional, including payment of duty as determined by Customs. Customs authorities could not confer or withdraw EOU status, since that function rested with the Ministry. On those facts, the relevant conversion date was not the first DTA clearance, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>