<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 347 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466321</link>
    <description>In a passing off action, interim injunction can be granted where the defendant&#039;s use of a well-known name is prima facie likely to misrepresent an association and deceive purchasers, even if the plaintiff does not manufacture the same goods. The Court applied the test of likelihood of confusion and injury to goodwill, noting that similarity need not be complete and that an unwary purchaser of average intelligence and imperfect recollection could be misled by the use of &quot;Bata&quot; in &quot;Batafoam&quot;. The plaintiff therefore established a prima facie case for temporary protection, and the defendants were restrained from using the impugned name pending disposal of the suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 11:17:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 347 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466321</link>
      <description>In a passing off action, interim injunction can be granted where the defendant&#039;s use of a well-known name is prima facie likely to misrepresent an association and deceive purchasers, even if the plaintiff does not manufacture the same goods. The Court applied the test of likelihood of confusion and injury to goodwill, noting that similarity need not be complete and that an unwary purchaser of average intelligence and imperfect recollection could be misled by the use of &quot;Bata&quot; in &quot;Batafoam&quot;. The plaintiff therefore established a prima facie case for temporary protection, and the defendants were restrained from using the impugned name pending disposal of the suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=466321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>