<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 26 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785831</link>
    <description>A pre-existing dispute raised by a detailed notice under insolvency law prevents admission of an insolvency petition where the notice identifies specific reasons disputing the claim; the Adjudicating Authority therefore correctly refused to admit the Section 9 application and the appellate forum concurred. The respondent asserted a post-contract settlement that the claimant disputes as unclear and possibly forged; factual conflict over completion dates and payments supported the existence of a dispute. The appeal is dismissed, with leave for the claimant to pursue any monetary claim against the corporate debtor before an appropriate forum in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 26 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785831</link>
      <description>A pre-existing dispute raised by a detailed notice under insolvency law prevents admission of an insolvency petition where the notice identifies specific reasons disputing the claim; the Adjudicating Authority therefore correctly refused to admit the Section 9 application and the appellate forum concurred. The respondent asserted a post-contract settlement that the claimant disputes as unclear and possibly forged; factual conflict over completion dates and payments supported the existence of a dispute. The appeal is dismissed, with leave for the claimant to pursue any monetary claim against the corporate debtor before an appropriate forum in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>