<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 33 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785838</link>
    <description>Deemed approval under the Green Channel regime treats a proposed combination as approved upon filing and acknowledgement; the Competition Commission retains exclusive jurisdiction to examine whether the combination falls outside Schedule III or whether the declaration was incorrect, in which case the deemed approval is void ab initio and the Commission will proceed under the Act. The appellate forum declined to decide questions about the correctness of the CCI filing or to admit additional documents, noting the appellant has pending proceedings before the CCI and a writ petition in the High Court; the application seeking relief on those competition issues was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 33 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785838</link>
      <description>Deemed approval under the Green Channel regime treats a proposed combination as approved upon filing and acknowledgement; the Competition Commission retains exclusive jurisdiction to examine whether the combination falls outside Schedule III or whether the declaration was incorrect, in which case the deemed approval is void ab initio and the Commission will proceed under the Act. The appellate forum declined to decide questions about the correctness of the CCI filing or to admit additional documents, noting the appellant has pending proceedings before the CCI and a writ petition in the High Court; the application seeking relief on those competition issues was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>