<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 34 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785839</link>
    <description>In a section 7 insolvency context, financial debt and default were treated as established on the basis of loan documents, security papers, account statements, and an authenticated default record, and the corporate debtor&#039;s acknowledgement of non-payment reinforced that finding. Once default above the statutory threshold was shown, admission of the application followed. The debtor&#039;s MSME restructuring request did not bar or defer admission because the restructuring framework required cooperation with stock audit and inspection, and the record showed repeated non-cooperation and silence to audit-related communications. The belated restructuring plea was therefore not accepted as a basis to stop CIRP admission, and the admission order was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 34 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785839</link>
      <description>In a section 7 insolvency context, financial debt and default were treated as established on the basis of loan documents, security papers, account statements, and an authenticated default record, and the corporate debtor&#039;s acknowledgement of non-payment reinforced that finding. Once default above the statutory threshold was shown, admission of the application followed. The debtor&#039;s MSME restructuring request did not bar or defer admission because the restructuring framework required cooperation with stock audit and inspection, and the record showed repeated non-cooperation and silence to audit-related communications. The belated restructuring plea was therefore not accepted as a basis to stop CIRP admission, and the admission order was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>