<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 35 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785840</link>
    <description>Applicability of limitation to an application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code turned on whether there was a pre-existing dispute and whether any supporting record showed settlement. On the facts noted, no sufficient document was on record to establish settlement, and no reason was found to differ from the view taken below. The appeal was dismissed, leaving the treatment of limitation and pre-existing dispute undisturbed on the material presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 35 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785840</link>
      <description>Applicability of limitation to an application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code turned on whether there was a pre-existing dispute and whether any supporting record showed settlement. On the facts noted, no sufficient document was on record to establish settlement, and no reason was found to differ from the view taken below. The appeal was dismissed, leaving the treatment of limitation and pre-existing dispute undisturbed on the material presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>