<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 37 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785842</link>
    <description>Director disqualification under company law was addressed alongside the validity of interim directions restraining payments to directors and preventing creation of third-party interests in company assets; the tribunal affirmed that maintaining status quo on assets, payments, remuneration and repayments is permissible and refused to set aside or modify the interim orders. The bench objected to adding an incident in hard copy after e-filing. Appellants may apply to the adjudicating authority for renewal of any collateral security; appeals were disposed with a request that the adjudicating forum pronounce the judgment reserved earlier.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=883450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 37 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785842</link>
      <description>Director disqualification under company law was addressed alongside the validity of interim directions restraining payments to directors and preventing creation of third-party interests in company assets; the tribunal affirmed that maintaining status quo on assets, payments, remuneration and repayments is permissible and refused to set aside or modify the interim orders. The bench objected to adding an incident in hard copy after e-filing. Appellants may apply to the adjudicating authority for renewal of any collateral security; appeals were disposed with a request that the adjudicating forum pronounce the judgment reserved earlier.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>