https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785857 Writ interference is generally unwarranted where an adequate statutory appeal remedy exists and there is no jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, or violation of statutory provisions. The article also notes that a customs penalty for knowingly facilitating the export of misdeclared diamonds was supported by seized records, investigation statements, and lab-testing material, showing improper export under customs and SEZ procedure. In that factual setting, the penalty was not found illegal or disproportionate, and no basis for judicial interference was identified. en-us Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:20:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785857 Writ interference is generally unwarranted where an adequate statutory appeal remedy exists and there is no jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, or violation of statutory provisions. The article also notes that a customs penalty for knowingly facilitating the export of misdeclared diamonds was supported by seized records, investigation statements, and lab-testing material, showing improper export under customs and SEZ procedure. In that factual setting, the penalty was not found illegal or disproportionate, and no basis for judicial interference was identified. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785857